Dr Suzanne Humphries response to Debunk The Funk
Published 20 Apr 2025
[Dr. Suzanne Humphreys]
[0:00:01]
Hello, my name is Dr. Suzanne Humphreys.
Introduction and Background
Some of you may already know me, but for people who don't, I left my centralized medical job in 2011 because I was watching vaccines harm my acutely sick patients while hospital policy insisted on double flu vaccinating them on admission against both scientific logic and my own wishes. Anytime the downside of flu shots were mentioned, there are nonsensical responses of what about smallpox and what about polio forced me to study the dark alleys of vaccine science, starting with Jenner's 1798 smallpox invention. The whole story of what happened in my career can be found on a series in my Odyssey channel called Honesty Versus Policy.
Honesty Versus Policy Series
But the word stunning doesn't cover what the medical libraries had on their shelves. None of what I learned in this journey was taught to me in medical school. After starting to speak out publicly, Rowan Bistrianic shared his graphs and later suggested that we coauthor a book which was to be detailed using the history on the subject of vaccination.
Co-authoring Dissolving Illusions with Rowan Bistrianic
[0:01:12]
We worked together for several years and published the book called Dissolving Illusions. Joe Rogan had decided to get the COVID shot, but by a fluke of events, he didn't.
Joe Rogan's Experience with COVID and Ivermectin
And instead, he got COVID infection and decided to look outside the box and use ivermectin along with other modalities. Mainstream news outlets attempted to humiliate him for talking about ivermectin and then came the threat for Spotify to possibly de-platform him, which they ultimately chose not to. Even though he began as a pro-vaxxer, having vaccinated his own children and was prepared to get COVID jabs, he had been accused of agreeing with conspiracy theorists in the eyes of the public mainstream narrative and of being an anti-vaxxer simply for stepping out of line and thinking for himself. Later, he happened to have read Dissolving Illusions, and then it seems as though he actually read it again and gained a very good understanding of the concepts and went on to mention the book three times over the course of some months in 2024.
Joe Rogan's Endorsement of Dissolving Illusions
[0:02:14]
And much to my surprise, he invited me on the podcast, and for two and a half hours, we had a casual discussion with no predetermined talking points. Some of my comments have been subject to a lot of scrutiny by bloggers, videographers, and anyone else who ascribes to the Church of Vaccinology.
Scrutiny from the "Church of Vaccinology"
And you may think the term Church of Vaccinology is my idea of a joke, but the precedent was set a long time ago by one of the lead priests of ritual demand named Dr. Gregory Poland, editor-in-chief of the journal Vaccine from 2010 to the end of 2024, where he said that the 11th commandment is thou shalt get a flu vaccine and encouraged everybody to do it for themselves and their patients.
[0:03:01]
He was talking to doctors.
Daniel Musa Williams' Critique
Well, it just so happens that the first dog out of the gate to attack Joe Rogan and myself was someone named Daniel Musa Williams, who was plainly extremely upset that Joe Rogan has upwards of 19 million people watching his podcast and that Joe Rogan is not parroting the mainstream mantras and soundbites of vaccine belief. Dan happens to be upset with me for supposedly using my medical degree haphazardly. Dan created a 90-minute video in which people are told that they don't have to watch Joe and me because Dan did it for them. And if you don't already know, this is a typical posture from the pro-vaccine because they attempt to deflect you from using your own brain because clearly he thinks you're a child and not intelligent enough to do your own research or thinking. After all, you could come to the wrong conclusion. So he needs to do the thinking for you.
[0:04:01]
Now, I'm gonna tell you that I think you should go watch Dan. I think you should listen to every word he says. And I think you should watch the Joe Rogan podcast if you're interested.
Daniel Musa Williams' Background
But before debunking Dan, it's really important to know who this alleged debunker is and what his background is. I think we can rely on Wikipedia in this case since the pro-vaccine have control of Wikipedia. Dan has a PhD in molecular biology from studying yeast transport peptides. Three yeast ribosome publications bear his name. And now he's trying to become famous by tossing shoes at famous people like Joe Rogan and Robert Kennedy and Kevin McKernan and now me. And here he is debunking subjects which aren't even in the same town as his wheelhouse.
[0:05:00]
Furthermore, here's a list of items that Dan is not qualified to do.
Daniel Musa Williams' Lack of Medical Qualifications
Does Dan have the ability to diagnose an illness? No. Is he qualified to clinically manage any bacterial or viral infection? No. Is he qualified in internal medicine and nephrology? No. Is he qualified to expound on what vaccines are, what they do and their impact on real patients? No. Has Dan authored any books? He has not. Dan laid out more of his credentials and aspirations on the 31st of July, 2023 to someone named Christy Harrison who is a dietitian that presumably thinks that she's a co-challenger of what she considers conspiracy theory.
Daniel Musa Williams' Employment at Janssen
Dan makes no secret that he works for a vaccine company. And you can see here that he talks about it, that he is a scientist at Janssen. The excerpts you see here are from her blog.
[0:06:02]
Dan's narrative is that September 11th plunged him into conspiracy theories, presumably when he was probably a child.
Daniel Musa Williams' YouTube Channel
But once he started trying to be a scientist, his teachers taught him how to think like a good scientist. And because he loves communication and having fun, he coincidentally started a YouTube channel in the year 2020. Here you can see that Dan says that he ignores the trolls. And even though I actually do consider Dan to be a troll, I'm not going to ignore him. Why? Because he's so far out of his wheelhouse that I want people to know that even though he might be one of the best of the trolls that came after me, that he doesn't read most of what he posts and just how out of school he is on the topic of vaccine history with zero qualifications beyond baker's yeast ribosome discussions and adenovirus vectors for gene therapy. And it just so happens that Paul Offit and Janssen are behind him.
[0:07:01]
But this is just how industry works. Dan isn't the first person they've set out to go after the so-called conspiracy theorists. And in fact, we have a tab on dissolvingillusions.com for criticisms, which these videos will go under in due time. So now you know a little bit about Dan, but what do you know about me?
Dr. Humphreys' Credentials and Experience
My first degree was a Bachelor of Arts majoring in physics, after which I worked in a microbiology laboratory for two years, where I became the head technician conducting all of the tests on alpha tubulin transport mechanisms in neurons, nerves. It was a large elaborate lab where I controlled the animal colonies, harvested the nerves and brains of animals, tissue cultured them using many of the same liquids commonly used in vaccine production, both today and in the past. I also conducted gel chromatography, radio labeling of proteins, isolation of techniques, and lots more than that, that I just won't even get into. I was also in charge of mentoring the medical students who are on rotation in my library, which was actually a surreal experience.
[0:08:07]
And just to be kind, I'll say that it made me realize that if they were doctor quality, then so was I. Because of my valuable contribution to the laboratory and the publication, I was given authorship of this 1989 paper on the dynamics of alpha tubulin deacetylation in intact neurons. Then I spent four years at Temple University Medical School, after which I did an internal medicine residency in the Bronx, New York. But seeing what damage the drugs I was prescribing did to kidneys, I decided to go even further into debt and do a two-year nephrology fellowship back in Philadelphia again. Then I took an academic position for two years and in the year 2000 went into private practice alongside a teaching hospital in Maine. Here's the link on my Odyssey channel to view a video series about what drove me from being pro-vaccine to questioning the very foundations of vaccination.
Odyssey Channel Video Series on Vaccine Skepticism
[0:09:06]
Just before going into my first academic position, I published this 1999 paper as the result of a personal research project which came out of the fact that dietary magnesium is related to insulin resistance. This has direct clinical applications to medical practice. Now, I too was taught to think like a good scientist does. I was a member of the Church of Vaccinology and I gave plenty of vaccines until the day came when reality hit me between my clinical eyes and I started to see exactly what vaccines were doing to my patients.
Publication of Dissolving Illusions and Rising from the Dead
So next came Dissolving Illusions in 2013. Then came my autobiography called Rising from the Dead in 2016 and just last year, we released a 10th anniversary edition of Dissolving Illusions with 200 extra pages and we also released a large companion book both published in 2024.
[0:10:01]
So do you remember what I said about soundbites traveling the globe instantly with minimal information to back them up?
Addressing Soundbites vs. Detailed Explanations
Whereas those of us who realize that we've been lied to by omission have to expound an encyclopedia in order to refute simple soundbites.
Refuting the Need for a Years-Long Vaccine Safety Study
At around seven minutes 21 seconds in Dan's admonishment of me, he refutes the very issue that I initially spent the most time on and he's not the first person to state that I should have done a years-long study to prove the safety of a vaccine biological. I considered it back then actually so he wasn't the first person to think of it and I realized that parents and patients in the real world were who I wanted to reach, not academics who would toss out my research on the basis of it being retrospective or non-placebo controlled or published in a not high impact journal and then by someone they labeled obviously as an anti-vaxxer because as soon as you step out of line and have any negative thoughts
[0:11:01]
about any vaccine whatsoever, you become an anti-vaxxer just like Joe Rogan did.
Response from Medical Authorities
So only the pro-vaccine can get away with the soundbites. Instead, I decided to write a paper and I submitted it to all hospital authorities and I was met with silence or outright disdain after I did that. The medical authorities at the hospital couldn't respond to my paper so they recruited a so-called expert from New Hampshire to send me a letter which stated that flu vaccines are safe for my kidney patients because flu vaccines produce antibodies in people with HIV and that I should stay in my lane.
Dr. Humphreys' Paper on Flu Vaccines and Kidney Patients
The paper that I wrote is available on my website, drsuzanne.net and has actually helped many people to this day.
Discussion of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act
Dan's first irritated discourse was to do with my comment that the 1986 National Child Vaccine Injury Act was quote horrible as I stated on the Rogan podcast and that the compensation tables were narrowed pretty rapidly after the act was passed thus gutting much of what the pro-vaccine parents of the time fought so hard to put into the legislation.
[0:12:15]
That was actually my point. So Dan, just in case you don't know, the NVICP was established in 1986, not 2000 because Dan put up as evidence a document from the year 2000 so I'm not sure where he's really thinking on that and the people listed on the congressional website which is your link were not anti-vaccine at all. Neither were the people who championed, as you said, the NVICP in 1986.
The NVICP and Pro-Vaccine Advocates
I know that because I know these people on the list and the ones who championed the 1986 NVICP. They were all very much pro-vaccine and if you bothered to look at the congressional records of the time like S2117 or S827
[0:13:00]
or any of the other congressional records in print, you would see that all the anti-vaccine were vehemently against the establishment of the NVICP in all the records from 1982 onwards and also it was the AAP who went to Barbara Lowe Fisher and Jeff Schwartz to ask them to partner in the drafting of the legislation. Why them? Because it was Jeff Schwartz and his law firm partner Steve Lawton who had written the swine flu indemnity legislation in 1976 as I stated, which gave fertile ground for the 1986 legislation. So it was indeed the trial run for what would become the 1986 legislation. Dan seems to think that the 1986 VICP legislation is the only good thing that the anti-vaccine people did.
Criticisms of the VICP
Yet the 2000 document that Dan links to is addressing the horrible shortcomings of a compensation program that the pro-vaccine parents hated and how to improve it.
[0:14:01]
How is it that Dan can think it's so wonderful? The subcommittee didn't think so. It's even worse now and I'm left wondering if you even read your own document, Dan, or if one of your mentors just handed it to you. On the other hand, Janssen would consider the program fantastic because getting compensation is like pushing a lake uphill using a straw. Of course, if Dan had bothered to read even the summary from the beginning of the 23-page paper, he would have known that the complaints were all from aggrieved pro-vaxxers. After all, this isn't a program that the anti-vaxxers cared about ever because they didn't actually need it.
Difficulty of Collecting Compensation
Dan says the VICP makes compensation easy to collect and he used this link and screenshot here as a reference. But the blog that he cited is not about how easy it is to collect. Dan's citation is from July 31st, 2024, a blog written by an attorney who explains who is eligible to apply and who pays the attorney.
[0:15:08]
The article does not give any stats whatsoever on successive applicants. This lawyer explains that the lawyers claim their money from the NVICP, so formerly pro-vaccine parents turned skeptics don't have the stress of putting their own money on the line to apply. Again, Dan used a misleading heading designed to create the impression in the minds of his ignorant cheerleaders that compensation is easy to get. So getting back to my assertion
Narrowing of the Vaccine Injury Tables
that the tables were narrowed down, leaving many children who had brain damage and more out of the no-fault legislation,
Introduction of Dr. Morris, Former FDA Vaccine Safety Researcher
let me introduce you to a PhD scientist with far more credentials than Dan who spoke on the problems with the VICP back in 1995 after he retired from a long career with the DBS Division of Biologic Sciences and the FDA
[0:16:01]
as one of their top vaccine safety researchers. He also contributed valuable testimony in all of the congressional hearings between 1982 and 1986. Just a few of his credentials are listed here. He worked alongside Bernice Eddy, Robert Hull, who's the premier simian virus expert and authored papers with Eddy and others in the DBS and FDA. A few of his published articles were around BK polyomavirus, adenovirus, influenza, Marek's disease, SV40 and other vaccine culture contaminants. His job at DBS and FDA was primarily safety testing of vaccines. He was adamantly opposed and oppressed by nasty, well-funded, ignorant pharma-backed people just like Dan. In this video, which I linked to at the bottom of the slide, Dr. Morris discusses the fact that the original compensation tables were more inclusive and later narrowed down so as to deny people who had real injuries.
Dr. Morris's Criticisms of the VICP
[0:17:07]
He was adamantly opposed to the vaccine injury compensation program, making it clear in every presentation to Congress that this act would be a tragedy for children, but a bonanza for the manufacturers. And I have all the documentation to back up what I just said. He had already experienced the travesty that was the swine flu indemnity legislation and predicted that the 1986 one would be even worse.
Summary of Changes to the Vaccine Injury Tables
So to summarize what happened from the vaccine injury tables, just looking at DPT for now, in the original table, you could claim no fault if there was anaphylaxis from zero to 24 hours after the vaccine. That was changed over to you could claim if there was zero to four hours after the vaccine. The original table, you could collect for encephalopathy for three days, and that did not change.
[0:18:03]
In the original table, shock and hypotonic collapse, which was quite common actually, could be collected if it happened up to three days after the vaccine. And in the new legislation, it was wiped off. In the original legislation, residual seizure disorder up to three days could be claimed no fault, and that was also wiped off. So what about MMR? In the original legislation, it's the same. It was 24 hours, and then that was decreased down to four hours. Encephalopathy, you could claim if the injury happened between zero and 15 days after the vaccine, but then they changed it to five in 15-day window. So if your child had encephalopathy between zero and five days, you were now out of luck. And residual seizure disorder, again, was just taken off the table. So it turned out that Dr. Morris was actually correct. Within months of the legislation passing, the manufacturers went behind everyone's back and had the table changed, and from then on, the manufacturers got what they wanted.
[0:19:08]
But there's more. The original legislation had a no liability protection for doctors and nurses.
Changes to the Original Legislation
They were to be held responsible for negligence. But in 1987, in the dark of the night, this amendment came in a budget reconciliation bill, and pro-vaccine parents involved were not informed. Vaccine pushers and injectors were from then on protected. Original legislation contained the mandate for a 13-page information booklet to be given to parents. This was ultimately boiled down to one page, which is where it stands today, and which is what I saw when I would walk into the room of a patient 25 years old on chemotherapy for a blood disease, had been given this little one-page piece of paper with documentation of how safe and effective flu vaccines were. And if they agreed, they would get it right there on the spot in the hospital.
[0:20:01]
Informed consent was done away with because the objective has always been to get you to respond to information by taking the vaccine. As blatantly demonstrated in this 1996 article, which states that non-essential concepts should be deleted from patient educational pamphlets, and only the key points should be given in order to achieve the behavioral objective, and that the key is to write for the desired health behavior. Dan calls Barbara Lowe Fisher, my colleague, and implies that she is an anti-vaxxer.
Barbara Lowe Fisher's Advocacy Work
She is actually my colleague, and I actually have a lot of respect for her. I know Barbara as a woman who has spent her entire adult lifetime since her child was injured by DPT. And she now fights for the rights of parents who object to many mandatory vaccines because as a pro-vaxxer, she got so burned by the gutting of the legislation that she championed in 1986, and because of all that came afterwards.
[0:21:03]
Here's a two-hour video where she talks to Del Bigtree on the high wire, and she actually shows what happened to the legislation, who was involved, why it was done, how it was done, and uses supporting documents. And I think this is a very good video to watch. Not that Dan will.
Supreme Court Ruling on Design Defect Liability
One last point I would like to make is that the original legislation had liability for design defect to vaccines. But in 2011, the Supreme Court threw children under the bus by giving indemnity to manufacturers for design defect, meaning that if there was a flaw in the vaccine structure, composition, or formulation, that could have been corrected by feasible alternative designs without compromising the vaccine's cost or utility, that's now overlooked. Dan touts the NVIC as a no-fault, no-cost system to the parent who has applied.
Challenges in the VICP Process
But you do still have to prove that it was the vaccine and not something else.
[0:22:04]
You do need medical records, documentation, and to show that it was all within the timeframes, and you have to apply within the statute of limitations. The actual proceedings for the pro-vaccine people claiming injury are long drawn out and legally combative. It is not a no-fault system in that the burden of proof rests on the plaintiff to prove that it was the vaccine and not something else. It is emotionally draining and certainly not for the faint-hearted. Most people have to contend with years of post-traumatic stress syndrome and collect nothing at the end. This should not happen from a system that does not allow opt-outs or give informed consent before pushing jabs. As to actually collecting, the only person guaranteed to collect anything 100% of the time is the lawyer, given that the vast majority of cases are rejected and only the lawyers get a chunk from the VICP excise tax pie.
Lawyers as the Primary Beneficiaries of the VICP
[0:23:02]
Again, this is not a program that the anti-vaccine conspiracists have championed, and neither do they even have a dog in the race.
The Excise Tax and the Consumer
We're always told that pharma pays the excise tax, but ultimately the customer is the one who pays. The merchant has to do the actual payment, but they just add the cost onto the product that we pay for. Dan cites a very interesting book, which does not say any such thing as what he says.
Refuting Claims about DTP Vaccines
He said DTP vaccines were shown to not be responsible for the health scares. So this book and Table 1.1 is available online. So do you see the right-hand side, no data, no data, no data? No data doesn't mean there were lots of studies which proved that the vaccines didn't cause any problems. No data means there were no studies to look at, which is why under DPT, we see these comments in the chapter that Dan cited.
[0:24:05]
Inadequate to accept or reject, inadequate to accept or reject, inadequate to accept or reject a causal relation between DT, residual seizure disorder, infantile spasms, et cetera. Here's more. The evidence is inadequate. Conclusion, the evidence is inadequate to accept or reject a casual relation. And the reason that the evidence is inadequate to accept or reject a casual relationship is because there were no studies done and therefore no data available to study. And the documentation makes it clear that there are problems centered around lack of adequate data and the paucity of relevant research. This book is a good resource in some regards because they had to admit that there was no data contrary to what Dan says.
Discussion of DPT and Encephalitis
[0:25:05]
Dan says that diligent nerds looked at whether DPT actually caused encephalitis and that time and again, they found no real association between DPT vaccines and encephalitis and that the cases were coming from other syndromes. Well, I would just like to show you a couple pages from Dissolving Illusions where we covered this encephalitis issue regarding DPT, which was eventually shown to be so harmful that a safer but less effective acellular vaccine was released, which is the one most people in America get today, but overseas the DPT is still used. And on the page on the right, we quote a professor Ehringut, who was a former director of the Institute of Vaccinology and Virology in Hamburg, Germany. And he states that there was a strong bias against believing that the central nervous system complications followed whooping cough vaccines. He states that the pertussis complications were underestimated.
[0:26:00]
Roman and I went to great lengths to show you the full story around DPT and acellular DTAP vaccines and how much damage they actually have done. Everything we stated is reference for you to check. There's so much more to the story than I can even fit into this video, including the Swedish story where 84% of children who had pertussis were fully vaccinated in Sweden.
The Swedish Story and Pertussis Vaccine
So the Swedish health ministry recommended the discontinuation of the vaccine in 1979. And strange enough, deaths for pertussis remained near zero even without the vaccine, which makes sense and should have every parent questioning the rationale for ever introducing the vaccine in the first place, given the death rate was so low even before the first vaccines were introduced, as you can see here using the Swedish data. You can see here for England and Wales. These are all from Dissolving Illusions. You can go and look at these for free on dissolvingillusions.com. And here you have the USA. And you can see where we got our data from, that they are official vital statistics from all around the world.
Shoulder Injuries and SIRVA
[0:27:03]
So citation number five, most compensations are for shoulder injuries. Dan likes the VICP because it pays so many people for shoulder injuries. So let's have a look at that. Most of the injuries awarded to clients of one of the many law firms in one year, 2018 is shown here, and it says that they were from shoulder injuries, SIRVA, that's what the acronym is. While there were a few claims filed for shoulder injuries, prior to 2017, SIRVA or shoulder injuries were first formally allowed into the table in 2017. In 2018, 54.2 of all claims awarded were for SIRVA, not the case in 2017 or before. And in 2019, 55.4% were SIRVA claims. You will not find either SIRVA or vasovagal syncope in the original 1986 table, nor thereafter because the original intent was to compensate for damage from the substance injected and not the negligence of the administrator.
[0:28:12]
SIRVA was added in 2017. HHS stated that they wanted to remove SIRVA and vasovagal syncope in 2019 on the basis that SIRVA and fainting was not related to the contents in the syringe as shown at the bottom here.
HHS's Attempt to Remove SIRVA and Vasovagal Syncope
Shoulder injury related to vaccine administration was clogging up the NVICP administration staff, the courts, and dragging out the time of legal proceedings for other more serious claims. Here's a screenshot using AI proving that the Federal Register announced the removal of SIRVA and vasovagal syncope. Because the NVICP was never meant to include negligent administration of a vaccine, SIRVA and vasovagal syncope were both slated for removal from the table in 2021.
[0:29:02]
The final rule was actually published, but it was immediately rescinded by the Biden administration because the new administration, Bidens, wanted to have indemnity coverage for all the physios, paramedics, and anyone else they brought in to assist in ensuring that there would be multiple needles regularly into every arm.
Biden Administration's Reversal of the Final Rule
How did that happen? It's very instructive to read the 21st January, 2021 Federal Register announcing the final rule. Look at every excuse under the sun as to why no fault compensation for negligence of the vaccine administrator should not be removed from the table. The but-for argument that if there wasn't a vaccine given, then SIRVA wouldn't happen didn't fly with HHS, who simply replied, if the vaccinator put the right length needle in the correct part of the muscle at the correct angle and depth, SIRVA would not be possible. But the two comments shown here, one was a threat and the other a delaying tactic are the two most important ones in my mind because the Biden administration revoked the final rule.
[0:30:07]
To protect all vaccinators and to prevent any negative impact the COVID vaccination campaign, as well as the annual influenza vaccination effort could have had. So there was a lot more that went on behind the scenes to negate the science and legal reasons, which HSS quoted, to remove SIRVA and vasovagal syncope from the table. It could be said that revoking the final ruling was giving Trump's appointees the middle finger while ignoring the actual science. As someone who has administered many vaccines and other injections, which could also result in SIRVA, I know that there is no excuse for SIRVA to be on the VICP table.
Dr. Humphreys' Perspective on SIRVA
And anyone with a shred of scientific logic would also know that, but the manufacturers know what they're doing. What a victory to be able to say, like Dan, that most of the compensation is really for injection negligence and imply that the vaccines themselves are squeaky clean.
[0:31:04]
Regulatory capture by vaccine manufacturers doesn't just extend to the VICP tables.
Regulatory Capture by Vaccine Manufacturers
Every aspect of vaccine reactions is affected somehow.
Underreporting of Vaccine Reactions
These lawyers admit that most parents and doctors don't even know of the VICP program. He says that the reactions are under-reported and by the time parents realize that the problem was caused by a vaccine, it's too late to file a claim. So how can Dan state that vaccine reactions are actually rare when medical doctors rarely notice or report to VAERS or document the problem in a chart? I've known cases where the doctor admits to the patient that there was a problem, but never put it in the chart. So therefore they can't claim. Reporting to VAERS is laboriously time-consuming and you're very likely to be timed out and have to start again. There's another reason why we have no idea how many vaccine injuries there actually are.
The CDC's Automated Vaccine Injury Data System
[0:32:02]
And that's because the current system doesn't work. This is very amusing. So CDC and VAERS contracted a research team to develop an electronic system that would automate the capture of vaccine injury data. And you can see my reference right here. Using the data from the atrius health in the greater metropolitan Boston area was what they did. The entire adult and pediatric population served by atrius health was included in the adverse event surveillance system. You can see it was huge, just by giving you time to read that slide. So what it says here is that preliminary data were collected from June, 2006 through October, 2009 on 715,000 patients and 1.4 million doses of 45 different vaccines were given to 376,452 individuals.
[0:33:08]
Of these doses, 35,570 possible reactions, which is 2.6% of vaccinations were identified. This is an average of 890 possible events, an average of 1.3 events per clinician per month. These data were presented at the 2009 AMIA conference. Okay, so here's where it gets really good. So as you can see here, the writers of the report who conducted the study said that unfortunately there was never an opportunity to perform system performance assessments because the CDC contacts were no longer available and the CDC consultants responsible for receiving the data were no longer responsive to their multiple requests to proceed with testing and evaluation.
[0:34:02]
Essentially, the doors were locked and the CDC consultants went AWOL.
The CDC's Lack of Accountability
So if you have an accountability system that doesn't allow you to ignore something, you might realize that vaccines hurt far more people than you ever imagined. And should these people file a claim, the VICP would run out of funds really quickly, right? Doctors would be obliged to do their jobs and parents would know straight away what the problem was and why it happened. Then the illusion of safe and effective would be utterly exposed for the lie that it is. And the directive of the 1984 Federal Register would be violated.
The 1984 Federal Register Directive
Remember that 1984 Federal Register that I kept mentioning over and over in the Joe Rogan podcast? Any possible doubts whether or not well-founded about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist in view of the need to assure that the vaccine will continue to be used to the maximum extent consistent with the nation's public health objectives.
[0:35:04]
That's why CDC and FDA did not want a database that makes physicians, FDA, and CDC accountable. So long as we have no data, people like Dan can try to pull the wool over your eyes and say that vaccines have been studied by diligent nerds who have determined that all is well. Hopefully by now you can see that Dan is part of the wealthy vaccine religious mob that wants non-essential concepts to be removed from your site.
Addressing Mistakes Made on the Joe Rogan Podcast
So in a two and a half hour podcast, having a conversation with Mr. Rogan, which was very interesting and he was very gracious and I very much appreciated it, but I had no notes, I had no visuals, I couldn't open a book, it was just a conversation. And so, yeah, I did make a few mistakes. And as I said that I would, I would own my mistakes. And if someone wants to prove that I made a significant mistake, I will own that as well. And so I will tell you the mistakes that I did make and that I have been called out on.
[0:36:03]
Okay, this is a really big, bad one. I called cinnamon an herb. Well, it turns out that in order to be called an herb, the plant would have to have a green stem. And because cinnamon comes from a bark, it's technically a spice. Oh, bad me. Okay, I also said when speaking about the plasmid and COVID vaccine, and this was a pretty bad one, I will admit, I mistakenly called what should have been, I should have mentioned lipid nanoparticle and instead I said lipopolysaccharide. The fact of the matter is there is lipopolysaccharide in there, even though it's not supposed to be. And I am actually going to give a detailed video on this later, not because it was a huge, terrible mistake. And by the way, it's not a crime to make a mistake, especially when you own it. But I'm gonna clear that up at some point. But all the rest of what I said about the physiology was completely true. Now, over the years, I have corrected many people who have stated that MMR has mercury in it.
[0:37:00]
And then I went and did it. It was a slip of the tongue. I meant to say DPT. And for those of you who don't know, the trial polio vaccine had mercury in it in 1954, and it was removed in 1955. Very amusing reason why, because apparently the antigenicity of the vaccine wasn't strong enough. So without doing any testing whatsoever, they just removed it and released it in 1955. Turns out that there was some live polio virus in there that also was controlled by the mercury. But that's another story for another day that I will get into in another video. Multi-dose flu vaccines still do have thimerosal in them. And I did say that you have to call the HAZMAT team if there is a drop of a thimerosal-containing vaccine. Now, I've been called a liar on that. However, if you go and look up how to handle a spill from a thimerosal-containing vaccine, you will see that it has to be handled and disposed of using a black HAZMAT box, okay?
Future Topics and Upcoming Videos
[0:38:02]
So I'm not here just to attack Dan. I'm here because I think that these are all actually really good educational videos. And I have a lot of information that I have gathered over since 2008, when I first started doing this. And that information has just sat there. And thankfully, Joe Rogan has given me an audience, and that's one of the reasons why Dan is so upset and why all the other detractors are so upset. And I plan to use that audience and educate that audience and get some more information out there. So a lot of the intent of what I'm gonna do in the future is about educating people. It's not just about, I was right and you were wrong, because these are actually really important things that I'm happy to flesh out further and clarify any misunderstandings that there may have been regarding anything that I said. So future topics and upcoming videos, I'm going to cover the polio diagnostic changes that led to a drop in paralytic polio, whether or not there was a vaccine at all.
[0:39:00]
I'll tell you why I believe and the evidence that poliomyelitis is still here and possibly even more so than it was in 1954. I will show you that there are indeed payouts to vaccinating GPs and pediatricians, that there is definitely a system in place that encourages GPs and pediatricians to bully you and kick you out of their practice if you do not comply. I will show you the evidence that there is a paucity of saline placebos, even though Dan came up with a couple of them, or we're gonna have a good chat about that. I'm gonna talk about vaccines and kidney failure because that is an actual entity that many people with kidney failure will tell you about. And I will show you the evidence of that. I will show you the evidence for pesticides as a cause of poliomyelitis, that poliovirus is, was a commensal in the normal human intestine, that tonsillectomies played a big part in the fear campaign, basically magnifying the problem.
[0:40:00]
That aluminum in vaccines is actually a problem in terms of allergies and many other things, not just allergies. Allergies are like the best problem you could have after aluminum in a vaccine. The lie of vaccine rollouts immediately leading to death rate drops, that's just not true. The charts that are shown to us about the death rate drops going down often is about manipulation of how the cases are quantified after the vaccines are released. And I'll show you that as well. I'll talk about vaccine production and culture media and all the sickening substrates that are used in the process. I'll talk about why the evidence that there is for placenta is being depleted of stem cells. I've got that evidence, even though Dan says that's another lie. I will talk about the snake toxin motifs and spike protein and the in vivo vaccine spike production. Dan got really dark when I mentioned that one. Wowee, man, he did not like that. So maybe I'll do that one sooner than later. And the validity of Th1 and Th2 models, which he disparaged and tried to portray me as some sort of dinosaur that's not up with the times.
[0:41:07]
And the SV40 in history, and he didn't seem to understand what I was talking about regarding kanamycin resistance gene in the COVID shots or the SV40. He just thought that was completely outrageous. I'll show you the evidence for that. I'll show you the evidence that SV40 can be transmitted horizontally and vertically. And we'll talk about death midwives because while somebody could criticize my terminology saying death doula, I will tell you why I think that's actually a good terminology and that there is actually no term for the people that their sole job is to deliver stillbirth babies. And I'll show you the evidence that stillbirths increased radically and dramatically after the deployment of COVID vaccines. All right. Well, last but not least, if anybody wants to follow me, you can follow me on X and my handle there is drsuzanneh7.
How to Follow Dr. Humphreys
[0:42:05]
You could go to my Odyssey channel where pretty much every video I could still get my hands on, I have uploaded onto there. All kinds of topics are covered. The infant immunity series, the childbirth series, the breastfeeding series. You know, there's just so much valuable stuff on there. Other vaccines that we haven't covered today and that we don't cover in Dissolving Illusions. If you're interested in Dissolving Illusions, there's an enormous amount of free material available on dissolvingillusions.com as well as all the international translations we have and where the book could be purchased. We have it in all formats now, we have it on paper, we have it in audio and we have it on Kindle. And my website is drsuzanneh7.net. And if you don't know, I did write an autobiography about my exit from the medical system, but everything that happened before that, it's more of an amusing Goodread and that's called Rising from the Dead and you can order that at risingfromthedead.com.
[0:43:02]
Thank you very much for your time. I hope that this clarified some issues that are worthy of debate and absolutely pushback. Good night.